SOCIAL/DEVELOPMENT IMPACT BOND

A Social or Development Impact Bond (SIB or DIB) is a pay-for-results funding model involving multiple parties. It is designed to enable non-profit interventions (typically encouraged by public actors) to attract private investment in order to pre-finance the activities needed to generate a defined set of impact outcomes (outcome targets). Private investors provide the up-front capital. The impact bond reimburses the investors for their capital with a pre-defined return in case the outcomes targets are achieved. The transaction may be structured with a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) which acts as a contract partner for all actors involved. In this case the SPV takes on the private capital from the investors and contracts one or more service providers who are charged with actually generating the outcomes. The service providers are usually NGOs. There is typically an independent organisation involved for verification of the impact outcomes. An impact bond is not a bond in the traditional sense of the word, since the repayment and the return are dependent on the achievement of desired outcomes. In case the outcomes target is not met, the investors typically receive neither a return nor the (full) repayment of the principal.

Purpose/Fit

De-risk the testing and roll-out of innovative service delivery models by non-profit organisations, attracting private investment for the pre-financing of non-profit programmes

Can replace

Grants, public contracts

Risk/Return Profile

Dependent on the risk to achieve the pre-defined outcome target

Enterprise Lifecyle

No enterprise, but an (established) non-profit organisation with existing track record for achieving impact outcomes

Maturity

Linked to the length of the intervention, but usually around 3 years

Defining Criteria

Outcomes-based:
Repayment and return for the investor are tied to the achievement of outcomes (as opposed to activities or outputs).
Shift of risk to investors:
Investors, but not the service providers, carry the risk of non-achievement of outcome targets.
Specific scope:
Often focused on prevention measures and public cost savings.
Impact verification:
: Independent verification of the outcomes.

Interesting Variants and Options

  • In case of no need for pre-financing: a direct performance-based contract with ongoing results-based payments for outcomes achieved between the outcome payer and the service provider can replace the impact bond structure, thereby removing the SPV and reducing the complexity of the transaction (no need for raising private investment).

 

  • In case of limited need for pre-financing: a direct performance-based contract with an up-front payment (i.e. 30% of total funding) and ongoing results-based payments for outcomes achieved between the outcome payer and the service provider can replace the impact bond structure, thereby removing the SPV and reducing the complexity of the transaction (no need for raising private investment).

 

  • The risk for the investor can be partly reduced by a guarantee or first-loss capital provided by another public or philanthropic funder.

 

  • Staggered outcome targets can be defined so that repayment and return for investors is not “all or nothing”.

 

  • Bonus payments for the service provider can be agreed upon to increase the performance orientation (and return participation) of the service provider.

Source: Innovative Financing Toolkit, BRIDDHI, 2020

Other instruments that may be useful to you

REIMBURSABLE AND CONVERTIBLE SIINC

IMPACT-LINKED LOAN

IRMF (IMPACT-READY MATCHING FUND)

SIINC (SOCIAL IMPACT INCENTIVES)